Latest Posts

The University of Indianapolis Human Biology MS Degree

UIndy graduate students and Dr. Krista Latham working with an alligator skull on the table

I receive many inquiries about the University of Indianapolis Human Biology MS Degree regarding educational, forensic case and human rights work experiences.   This graduate program combines elements of forensics and biological anthropology and provides the opportunity for professional experience such as assisting archeological fieldschools and contract excavations, presenting original research and case studies at professional meetings, and working alongside professors to assist them in their own research. This program also prepares students for doctoral work in anthropology, anatomy, biology or medical school and is a foundation for careers in the forensic and clinical sciences and public health.

Dr. Nawrocki and graduate student Amanda Khan taking measurements from a human cranium with sliding calipers
Dr. Nawrocki and graduate student Amanda Khan taking measurements from a human cranium

Students can specialize in:  Anatomy and Physiology, Skeletal Biology/Human Osteology, Human Variation and Adaptation, Forensic DNA, Forensic Anthropology, Forensic Archeology, Taphonomy and Trauma Analysis, Human Evolution or Historic Period Cemetery Osteoarcheology.  Three faculty members who specialize in these topics serve as the main advisers in the program: Dr. Krista Latham, Dr. Stephen Nawrocki and Dr. John Langdon.  The Master’s in Human Biology is a full-time program that requires a minimum of 36 hours of coursework in three core areas: Anatomy and Physiology, Human Variation and Evolutionary Science.

Dr. Latham and graduate students Amanda Khan & Justin Maiers take measurements from a human bone with an osteometric board.
Dr. Latham and graduate students Amanda Khan & Justin Maiers take measurements from a human bone.

The faculty in the Human Biology program take a mentoring approach to education, with lots of individualized attention, informal instruction outside of the classroom, and ample opportunities for hands-on learning. This individualized approach to education is possible because of the small average cohort size that ranges from three to five students. Most students in a cohort rotate as a group through the same classes, which are generally small seminars with ample opportunity for discussion.

Graduate student Erica Christensen swabs a spent bullet casing for DNA analysis with a swab.
Graduate student Erica Christensen swabs a spent bullet casing for DNA analysis.

There are opportunities for both international and national research.  Students have collected data across the US, as well as in Rwanda, Belize, South Africa and Chile.  If your primary interest is in forensic anthropology, you will be expected to volunteer on forensic casework in the field and in the lab, starting your first semester.  If you’re pursuing study in forensic anthropology or historical osteoarcheology, you will need to demonstrate proficiency in archeological field methods.  The Human Biology faculty includes two board certified forensic anthropologists: Dr Latham and Dr Nawrocki.  Board certification is the highest achievement in the field of forensic anthropology and is a distinction shared with about 80 active and practicing forensic anthropologists around the world.

The University of Indianapolis Archeology & Forensics Lab team group photo on the site of a forensic recovery in rural Iowa.
The University of Indianapolis Archeology & Forensics Lab team on the site of a forensic recovery in rural Iowa.

The Master’s of Science in Human Biology Degree is highly competitive because of its unique approach emphasizing scientific method and an appreciation of human biological variation in a forensic context.  Application prerequisites include, but are not limited to,  completed courses in anatomy (with dissection) and chemistry, a minimum undergraduate GPA of 3.0 and GRE scores equivalent to a 150 on both verbal and quantitative sections of the GRE and a score of 4.0 or better on the writing section.

More information about the program including:  tuition information, admission requirements, laboratories and research, fieldwork and scholarly opportunities & assistantships and funding  can be found on our website:  http://www.uindy.edu/cas/MS-human-biology

Contact Dr. Nawrocki (snawrocki@uindy.edu) or Dr. Latham (lathamke@uindy.edu) with your questions or for more information.

Dr. Krista Latham & Dr. Stephen Nawrocki with a skeleton laid out in anatomical position on the table in front of them

And the Beat Goes On…

Photo of Ryan & Justin performing skeletal analysis on a cranium by Corpus Christi Caller Times
photo by Corpus Christi Caller Times

Thank you to all our readers who have joined us the past few years to learn more about forensic archeology, forensic anthropology and specifically the work that we’ve been doing to assist in the exhumation and identification of unknown migrants that have died in Brooks County Texas.  We plan on updating the blog at least once a month until our next human rights trip next summer.  Keep in mind the work towards identifications never stops!   Skeletal analyses at various institutions and human rights campaigns  continue all year.

We would like to know what you are interested in reading about. Do you want to know more about the specific techniques we use, the NamUs database, our lab, our university program, our crew? Please send your questions to Dr. Latham at lathamke@uindy.edu.  We look forward to hearing from you.

Photo of Dr. Krista Latham completing a dental analysis chart with a cranium and other skeletal elements laid out by the Houston Chronicle
photo by the Houston Chronicle

What was different about this year?

If I had to pick one thing that set this year apart from the others, it was our interaction with the living, breathing, human side of the story.

I started reading a book before the trip called Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies: Migrant Farmworkers in the United States, written by Seth Holmes. At one point in the book, the author writes:

“I have been asked to invite [migrants] to speak to other gabachos—and have been shocked how often conferences on migration include no migrants, even though they are presumably experts on the topic.”

I think this was a lingering feeling that I couldn’t really get past while being a part of this trip the years before this one. A disconnect existed, despite whether I felt it at the time or not. Before this year, I had never met a migrant. I had never seen REAL emotion from a face-to-face interaction; I had only seen it in pictures. I had never heard a migration story directly from someone who experienced it; I had only heard it secondhand from news reports, textbooks, law enforcement, etc.

This year, I met migrants. I saw real emotion, heard real stories, and experienced a different kind of emotion than I had felt the past two years. I read the missing persons reports and the tragic stories from loved ones searching for answers, and for the first time, I honestly felt scared.

I’ve been revisiting a few articles since coming back from the trip, trying to make connections between the past and the present. I found an article that was written by Robin Reineke of the Colibri Center for Human Rights that raises concerns about how media outlets describe the humanitarian crisis (read the article here). While most of the article explores the political and historical roots of the crisis, the one part that really struck me was her discussion on the dehumanization of migrants through language. After rereading her article with the context of this year’s experiences, a major point really clicked for me: what is happening on the border is a crisis on so many levels, and it is affecting so many human beings. Of course I’ve always known this and have referred to it as a ‘humanitarian crisis’, but this year I think I really felt what each of those two words are referring to. This is extremely human, and it is a crisis for so, so many people.

When I first posted about this year’s trip, I talked about searching for new perspectives that could enhance my ability to assist however possible. That search didn’t take long; a new perspective revealed itself every day. And I quickly understood that those perspectives will keep popping up as long as I recognize each conversation and interaction as a different, and equally informative, perspective.

I will continue to post as I begin my internship at the South Texas Human Rights Center. As always, I am extremely excited for the opportunities ahead and for the progress that will be made.

Ryan